Even if you’ve been hiding at the bottom of a Moon crater for
the last 6 months, chances are you would still have heard of Interstellar. The latest film from
big-budget auteur Christopher Nolan is, without doubt, the cinematic event of
the year. Just where would the man who had already breathed new life into the
Superhero genre & reinvented the Summer Blockbuster look to go next? The
answer, perhaps inevitably, was to the stars.
As with all of Nolan’s previous films, I found myself overwhelmed as
the credits began to roll on his bladder-busting ballet of space & time. It
is, literally, the best film I have ever seen. It is not, however, one of the
best films I have ever watched.
For the first 45 minutes or so, Interstellar
remains rooted to the launching pad, with the engines spluttering as they
struggle to come to life. The script, written by Nolan & his brother
Jonathan, fails to find a balance between developing the core characters and building
the foundations of the narrative. The dialogue clumsily stumbles between the
sentimental ramblings of Matthew McConaughey’s Cooper, and overly complicated
scene setting that’s delivered by Michael Caine’s one-dimensional professor of
exposition. There’s certainly more strength to be found in the more muted
scenes between Cooper and his kids (with young actors Mackenzie Foy &
Timothée Chalamet both delivering naturally assured
performances), but Nolan’s need to drive his quite convoluted narrative forward
causes the effectiveness of such scenes to quickly become undone.
Lets thank our lucky stars then that once Copper’s shuttle clears
the launch pad, Nolan’s film soars to a much greater height. Driving the ship
are the astonishing visuals, which beg to be seen, as Nolan intended, on the
biggest Imax screen you can find. The director has always been a man of great
ambition, but this is definitely the most visually audacious film he has ever
committed to celluloid. Hoyte Van Hoytema’s camera sweeps over the Icelandic
landscape that doubles for a far off planet with awe, forcing your eyes to open
as wide as possible in astonishment at this otherworldly setting.
It is against the blank canvas of Space however, that Nolan paints
his masterpiece. Here the director fervently tries and effortlessly succeeds in
evoking the visual majesty of Kubrick’s 2001.
Cooper’s ship, the ‘Endurance’, glides through space accompanied to Hans
Zimmer’s score as if it’s dancing an interplanetary foxtrot, cruising past
black holes and event horizons with grace and flair.
Unfortunately Nolan and his brother can’t help but make a meal of
the narrative. All the ingredients are certainly there, but the presentation is
messy. There are far more plot holes than wormholes here. Particularly in the
film’s final reel, which appears to eventually collapse under its own weight as
Nolan searches for his conclusion.
Even in its narratively weakest moments though, the gravitational
pull of Nolan’s vision can’t help but suck you in. But the overwhelming thought
that initially swirled through my mind following Interstellar was that it could have been light years better.

No comments:
Post a Comment